Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Building Bridges
Sunday, April 26, 2009
My Rosy Tinted Exgay Lenses
1) Did you find reparative therapy useful? Why or why not?
I don't think the ministry I was involved in used any techniques that would be considered "reparative" therapy. I did find my experience in the group to be useful. They provided a safe place where I was able to openly process my conflict of same sex attractions and my faith.
2) Why were/are you trying to rid yourself of homosexual tendencies? Is it because of personal, social, religious or cultural beliefs?
I'm sure each of the above beliefs influenced my motives but ever since I came to the Lord I felt convicted (in a loving way) that homosexuality was not what God intended for me.
3) Do you believe that homosexuality should be frowned upon, or is it something that you simply did not want to be a part of?
I don't think homosexuality should be "frowned upon", I just think it's part of the fallen human condition like so many other realities of life. As a Christian, I wanted to live the life that God called me to.
4) Has the therapy altered your sexual orientation? If so, have you had or are you in a relationship with a female?
My experience in the ministry helped me understand my attractions better. It also helped me understand God's unconditional love and grace. Understanding my attractions and God's grace gave me the freedom I needed to live life not controlled by my same sex attractions. This freedom has allowed me to pursue relationships (both platonic and romantic) in a different light. After 4 years of starting attending the ministry I became attracted to the woman who is now my wife. I don't credit the ministry as the entire reason why I pursued my wife and got married. I believe the Lord was preparing me, my entire life, for the marriage he had for me. Getting married was more about choosing to walk in the purposes God had for me, then was about having no same sex attractions. If orientation change only means going from exclusively homosexual attractions to exclusively heterosexual attractions then no, that's not what occurred. But then again, the ministry never communicated that as an expectation either.
5) Can you divulge some of the therapeutic practices that were used on you?
The ministry always held to the belief that homosexuality was the result of a relational deficit, so they believed the solution is also relational. Because of this, the focus of the ministry was to provide support and community. The main "practices" that were employed were a weekly support group and social gatherings such as hikes, game nights, movies, etc etc.
6) Why did you spent so many years in EX gay programs?
The time I spent at the ministry fed my soul. It was the first place that I was able to be me. People there affirmed my faith and understood where I was at with my sexuality. I also found a community of others who were in similar situations.
7) Do you have any final words or comments that you would like to express to Pink News readers?
My only other comments would be these... Not all "exgay" ministries are the same. From the experiences that I've heard from others who attended ministries from other parts of the country, I understand that some can be harmful. I think it goes wrong when the ministry leaders and the individual participant have the wrong focus. God does not hate you, no matter what. Seeking change and achieving change is not to gain more love if you succeed or loose God's love if you "fail". The goal really isn't homosexual attractions evaporating and gaining overwhelming heterosexual attractions. The goal should be holiness, wholeness, and freedom.
God's peace
John
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Free from Labels
- Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law.
- You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus,
- for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.
- There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Friday, April 17, 2009
The Dilemma Of Sexual Labels
Gay, Lesbian, Straight, Bisexual, Transgender, Asexual, Pansexual, Exgay...
Whew... is that all of them? Probably not! These are some of the common, and maybe not so-common (like pansexual and exgay), labels we use to define our sexuality. These particular terms are social. They help us understand ourselves in relation to our surroundings and to succinctly communicate our preferences and experiences with others. Even outside of sexuality, humans are inclined to categorization. Putting people, experiences, and things into categories helps us process, analyze, and arrive at conclusions in an efficient manner. However, categorization can also be problematic. One of the main drawbacks is that it requires oversimplification. In order to classify something into a category, we are forced to only consider its’ more obvious characteristics. The characteristics that we pay attention to are often biased by what we deem relevant to the category. Additionally, our culture influences our definitions of what fits into what category. The labels we use to categorize our sexuality are often limited and defined in the same manner. Oversimplification occurs in sexual identity labeling when we consider an attraction or an experience as a reason to automatically categorize a person and then label them as gay, lesbian, straight, etc. These social labels are defined largely by our culture. Our culture has set the equation: Biological Sex + Sexual attraction = Social Sexual Identity Label. For example, Male +Attraction for another male = Gay. We could come up with several other equations our culture uses to categorize and label sexuality by considering factors such as sexual behaviors and even gender roles and expectations. The sociological concept of labeling theory suggests that labels produce expectations and have the power to influence our perceptions and behaviors. Our influenced perceptions and behaviors then reinforce the label, thus a cyclical pattern of identity emerges.
I believe that the equation described above need not be limited to only a single result. Individuals have the freedom to calculate the factors and decide whether the typical corresponding social label applies to them personally or not. One person may indeed conclude that because they are a woman and are sexually attracted to other women, the label of lesbian fits them well. While another person may acknowledge that they have sexual attractions for the same gender, yet they do not accept the label of gay. However, it seems to me, the current cultural attitude about sexuality affirms the notion that the existence of same sex attractions only produces a label of gay. I see this attitude as extremely limiting to the individual’s right to self-discovery and expression, which I find rather ironic for a modern society that supposedly embraces and encourages these very ideals. I believe when we give ourselves the freedom to asses our life circumstances, draw our own conclusions, and choose our own labels as we see fit, then we are better equipped to allow others to do the same.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
The Podcast
I'm on the Journey
- I've learned that God's grace is sufficient for the journey. To me that means, that even though I'm still in process, that is still walking on the journey, God keeps me in his perfect love. Nothing can separate me from his love. For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither dirty thoughts or looking at porn, neither masturbation or any other moral failure in all creation will be able to separate me from the love of God. (Romans 8:38 says something close to that effect)
- I don't self identify as gay, bisexual, asexual, straight, or exgay. I have no use for these labels. None of them fit perfectly. I believe that I am a human, created in God's image, created a sexual being. I believe God has a specific design for sexuality and welcomes me to experience the abundance He has for me in His design.
- Along the way I've recognized that a lot of people who call themselves Christians have a difficult time understanding sexuality. Specifically, many struggle to know how to respond to others who identify themselves as gay and those who do not, but who struggle with same sex attraction. Many times this confusion has caused heated, ignorant, and mean-spirited debates. People have been wounded.
- I do believe that change is possible. However, what kind of change, how long it takes, and what the end results should/does look like are not always as simplistic as many would like to make them seem. I don't believe heterosexuality should be the end goal of "change" in our sexuality. Heterosexuality is broken too!! (I fully intend to write a blog entry with this as the title). As followers of Christ, we are called to submit to a process of self-denial(it's not popular, but it is biblical Matthew 16:24). Ultimately, we are changed by that process. Scripture also tells us that we are indeed being transformed (changed) into the image of Christ (2nd Corinthians 3:18).
